U.S. Office Market: 2019–2025

Overview

The U.S. office market experienced the deepest and most prolonged correction in modern commercial real estate history between 2020 and 2024, driven by the structural adoption of remote and hybrid work. National vacancy rose approximately 710 basis points — from 12.5% in early 2019 to 19.6% by the end of 2025 — while the construction pipeline collapsed 87% from its pre-pandemic peak. This page synthesizes Q4 2025 reports from CBRE, JLL, Colliers, and Cushman & Wakefield into a market-capitalization-weighted composite (the “CRE42 Composite”), tracking vacancy, net absorption, construction, and rents quarterly from Q1 2019 through Q4 2025.

Chart: CRE42 Composite — Net Absorption & Vacancy Rate

CRE42 Composite: U.S. Office Net Absorption (bars) and Vacancy Rate (line), Q1 2019 through Q4 2025. Shows strong positive absorption pre-pandemic, deep negative absorption in Q2 2020 and 2022-2023, and inflection to positive absorption in H2 2025. Vacancy rises from approximately 12.5% to 19.6% over the period.

CRE42 Composite: U.S. Office Net Absorption & Vacancy Rate, Q1 2019 – Q4 2025 | Source: CBRE, JLL, Colliers, C&W | Chart: CRE42

Market-cap weighted average (CBRE 63%, JLL 22%, Colliers 10%, C&W 5%). Pre-Q4 2024 values estimated from published charts; Q4 2024–Q4 2025 from reported tabular data.

Chart: U.S. Office Supply Dynamics — Completions vs. Removals

U.S. Office Supply Dynamics: New Completions (green line, declining from 55 MSF in 2019 to 17 MSF in 2025) and Inventory Removals (red line, rising from 5 MSF in 2019 to 42 MSF in 2025). Net new supply bars turn negative in 2024 at -8 MSF and deepen to -25 MSF in 2025.

U.S. Office Supply Dynamics: New Completions vs. Inventory Removals, 2019–2025 | Source: CBRE, JLL, Colliers, C&W | Estimates: CRE42

Removals include demolitions and conversions to residential, lab, hotel, and other uses. Net new supply turned negative in 2024 for the first time in modern records.

Key Observations

U.S. office vacancy rose from approximately 12.5% in Q1 2019 to 19.6% by Q4 2025. The CRE42 Composite — a market-capitalization-weighted average of CBRE, JLL, Colliers, and C&W — shows roughly 710 basis points of vacancy increase over six years, the largest sustained rise in modern commercial real estate.
Net absorption turned positive in H2 2025 after the longest negative streak since the early 1990s. All four brokerages agree the turning point occurred in Q3–Q4 2025, though full-year 2025 figures range from −6.7 MSF (C&W) to +21.0 MSF (CBRE) depending on how each firm accounts for demolished occupied inventory.
The construction pipeline collapsed to its lowest level in over 30 years. The CRE42 Composite shows 16.6 MSF under construction at year-end 2025, down from 130.7 MSF at the end of 2019 — a decline of roughly 87%. New groundbreakings in 2025 totaled just 7.4 MSF (JLL), nearly half from three New York City trophy projects.
Total U.S. office inventory is shrinking. An estimated 42 MSF of office space was removed through demolitions and conversions in 2025, while approximately 17 MSF of new space was delivered — a net reduction of roughly 25 MSF. This was the second consecutive year of negative net new supply.
Class A and trophy space is already in recovery. Full-year 2025 Class A absorption was +9.2 MSF even as the broader market remained mixed (C&W), and prime vacancy in the top 20 markets averages 5.6 percentage points below overall vacancy (CBRE). New construction is concentrated almost entirely in this segment.
Leasing volume is approaching pre-pandemic levels at roughly 210–225 MSF annually. Gateway markets led the rebound — Manhattan, San Francisco, and Boston posted 21–31% year-over-year leasing growth. However, average deal sizes are down 23% from 2019 while transaction counts are up 26% (CBRE), reflecting hybrid work’s structural impact on large-user footprints.
Sublease availability has declined 20–30% from its 2023–2024 peak across all brokerage measures. C&W reports 108.6 MSF (down 20% from peak), CBRE reports 133 MSF (down 31%), and Colliers reports 173.6 MSF (down 16% YoY). The reduction in shadow vacancy is a meaningful contributor to the stabilization.
Office-using employment declined 0.3% in 2025 (JLL). The current recovery is driven more by companies re-expanding for return-to-office mandates — 97% of Fortune 100 employees are now subject to hybrid or full-time requirements (JLL), averaging 4.0 days per week versus 2.8 in Q4 2023 — than by net new job creation.

Context & Discussion

Pre-Pandemic U.S. Office Market (2019)

In late 2019, the U.S. office market was in the final stages of a decade-long expansion. National vacancy stood at approximately 12.5% (CRE42 Composite), annual net absorption averaged 40–50 MSF, and over 130 MSF of new space was under construction. Work-from-home and hybrid arrangements existed, particularly in the technology sector, but remained a small fraction of overall office usage — the vast majority of tenants operated on a five-day, fully in-office basis. Construction was near cycle highs, and coworking operators, led by WeWork, had become among the largest tenants in several gateway markets, introducing an element of speculative demand that would later unwind.

Pandemic-Driven Correction (2020–2024)

Remote work adoption emptied office buildings in Q2 2020, and unlike prior recessions, tenants did not simply pause leasing — they actively shed space. Companies that had expanded through 2019 reduced footprints by an estimated 9% on average even as headcount grew roughly 5% (JLL), a structural shift that played out over several years rather than a single quarter. Sublease inventory surged to record levels as tenants marketed space they no longer intended to occupy. The correction was compounded by a construction pipeline that continued delivering 30–50 MSF annually through 2021–2022 into rapidly weakening demand. Cumulative negative net absorption over the 2020–2024 period totaled roughly 80–120 MSF (range reflecting different brokerage methodologies), and vacancy rose approximately 700 basis points from its pre-pandemic level.

Recovery Signals (H2 2025)

Net absorption turned positive in Q3 and Q4 2025 at a meaningful scale, with the CRE42 Composite showing approximately +16 MSF for the full year. Sublease availability declined 20–30% from peak, and the pace of vacancy increases slowed to its smallest increment since 2020. Several factors converged: return-to-office mandates became near-universal among large employers, with 97% of Fortune 100 companies requiring hybrid or full-time attendance (JLL); companies that over-reduced space during the pandemic began re-expanding to match actual headcounts; and the construction pipeline dried up so completely that even modest demand gains started to move fundamentals. Fifty markets posted positive full-year absorption, up from 33 in 2024, and gateway cities — Manhattan, San Francisco, Boston — led with 21–31% year-over-year leasing growth.

U.S. Office Market: 2026 and Beyond

Leasing volume appears to be finding a floor in the 200–225 MSF annual range, roughly 3% below 2019 levels (CBRE). The recovery, however, is uneven. Class A and trophy properties are seeing rising rents and tightening availability, with leases above $100/SF at record volume in gateway CBDs (JLL). Class B and C space continues to struggle — transaction counts are up 26% from 2019 but average deal size is down 23% (CBRE), and leases above 100,000 SF remain approximately 40% below pre-pandemic levels. Office-using employment declined 0.3% in 2025, meaning the demand recovery is driven primarily by occupancy expansion rather than net new hiring — a dynamic with limited remaining runway if hiring does not resume. On the supply side, new completions in 2025 totaled approximately 17 MSF while demolitions and conversions removed an estimated 42 MSF, producing a net inventory reduction of roughly 25 MSF. This was the second consecutive year of negative net new supply. The construction pipeline stands at approximately 17 MSF (CRE42 Composite), down 87% from 2019 levels, and new groundbreakings totaled just 7.4 MSF in 2025 — nearly half from three New York City projects (JLL). Developers require near-record rents and substantial preleasing before breaking ground, and institutional lenders remain largely unwilling to fund new office construction.

Sources

1. CBRE Research. U.S. Office Figures, Q4 2025. Vacancy, absorption, completions, rents, sublease, construction pipeline, prime vs. non-prime data. cbre.com/insights

2. JLL Research. United States Office Market Dynamics, Q4 2025. Vacancy, absorption, deliveries, rents, employment, property clock, Fortune 100 attendance data. jll.com

3. Colliers. U.S. National Office Outlook, Q4 2025. Vacancy, absorption, rents, construction pipeline, sublease, investment volume, regional data. colliers.com/research

4. Cushman & Wakefield. MarketBeat: United States Office, Q4 2025. Vacancy, absorption, rents, construction, inventory by approximately 90 markets. cushmanwakefield.com

5. Colliers. U.S. Office Market Statistics, Q4 2025. Summary infographic: vacancy, absorption, construction, Class A rents. colliers.com/research

6. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Office-using employment data, 2017–2025. bls.gov

Methodology & Data Notes

CRE42 Composite

The CRE42 Composite is a market-capitalization-weighted average of metrics reported by the four largest publicly traded U.S. commercial real estate brokerages: CBRE (NYSE: CBRE), Jones Lang LaSalle (NYSE: JLL), Colliers International (NASDAQ: CIGI), and Cushman & Wakefield (NYSE: CWK). Weights are based on approximate end-of-2025 market capitalizations: CBRE ~$47B (63.3%), JLL ~$16B (21.6%), Colliers ~$7.5B (10.1%), C&W ~$3.7B (5.0%).

Why Market-Cap Weighting?

Market capitalization reflects the market’s assessment of each firm’s scale, data quality, market coverage, and analytical capabilities. CBRE’s dominant weight (~63%) is appropriate given their position as the world’s largest CRE services firm by revenue and their extensive property-level data collection. Equal weighting would give C&W (which reported −6.7 MSF annual absorption due to its methodology for counting demolished occupied space) the same influence as CBRE (which reported +21.0 MSF). Weights are fixed annually to avoid rebalancing noise.

Why Metrics Differ Across Brokerages

Each brokerage tracks a different universe of U.S. office properties: Colliers tracks the broadest set at approximately 6.1 billion SF (including buildings as small as 10,000 SF), C&W tracks approximately 5.4 billion SF, JLL tracks approximately 4.8 billion SF, and CBRE tracks an estimated 4.5 billion SF of larger competitive properties. Differences in building inclusion criteria, owner-occupied exclusions, government buildings, and R&D/flex classification account for most metric variation. JLL reports both “total vacancy” (22.2%, including occupied sublease) and “direct vacancy” (20.1%); this composite uses JLL’s total vacancy for consistency.

Data Quality

For Q4 2024 through Q4 2025, all four firms provide tabular data extracted directly from reports. For Q1 2019 through Q3 2024, values are estimated by reading published quarterly charts. Chart-estimated values are approximate (±1–2 percentage points for vacancy, ±3–5 MSF for absorption) and are indicated with italic formatting and yellow highlight in the Excel spreadsheet.

Supply Dynamics Estimates

The supply dynamics chart estimates annual new completions and inventory removals (demolitions + conversions) by synthesizing figures from all four brokerage reports. Systematic tracking of inventory removals began around 2023 as conversions accelerated; earlier estimates are rougher. Key reference points: JLL reports approximately 40 MSF removed in 2025; C&W reports 20.7 MSF removed over 6 quarters ending Q4 2025; Colliers cites 100+ MSF in cumulative office removals since 2020.

Net Absorption Spread

The 28 MSF spread between CBRE (+21.0 MSF) and C&W (−6.7 MSF) in full-year 2025 absorption is primarily driven by how each firm accounts for approximately 40 MSF of demolished or converted inventory. When occupied space is demolished, C&W counts the lost occupancy as negative absorption; CBRE may remove the building from its tracked inventory without recording negative absorption. Neither approach is incorrect — they answer different questions about market health.